
|
|
Wills, Probate and AdministrationMistakes by trustees - setting aside Trustees everywhere can take heart from a recent case, which reaffirms the principle that blunders made by trustees can be set aside by the court. Against the advice of counsel, the trustees made a payment to the NSPCC as a means of avoiding CGT for the settlor. Unfortunately, the payment was made in the wrong tax year - with disastrous consequences in terms of the CGT charge. The court applied the principle first established in Hastings-Bass [1975] in order to render the payment void ab initio. Although the CGT charge would have fallen on the settlor, who was not a beneficiary of the trust, the court held that it was still able to set aside the payment. This was because the trust had been designed to save tax for the settlor, and the trustees would clearly never have acted as they did had they taken the CGT charge into account. Abacus Trust Company v the NSPCC [2001] WTLR 949. "The Practical Lawyer" December 2001/January 2002
|
|
Relevant material Beneficiaries: Codicils: Executors: Wills: Existence of Codicil Succession: Attestation: Capacity Wills - capacity - elderly testatrix prone to periods of confusion - lack of knowledge and capacity Wills, Probate and Administration Wills - Probate - Alzheimer's disease Will option: the essence of time? Real property – succession WILLS: CHILDREN: SUCCESSION Family wins £10m will victory over “witch” stepmother Probate claims: wills: children: deceased persons Millionaire’s ex-wife tells of suspicions over new will |
|||
![]() |
|
Click here for information
about the work we do for commercial clients. © Copyright Humphreys & Co., solicitors
|