|
 |
Asbestos-related cancer victims and their families have today (21st November 2008) won an important test case over access to compensation.
The case began in the High Court on 3rd June 2008.
Insurance companies were denying liability to pay compensation in mesothelioma cases on the basis that under policies taken out by employers to cover themselves against liability to workers who become ill due to their work, liability was "triggered" by the onset of asbestos related disease rather than by the exposure to asbestos.
The insurers argued that they had no liability under policies which covered the time when employees were exposed to asbestos but which did not cover the time when they fell ill. As the time lapse between exposure to asbestos and developing mesothelioma can be as much as 40 years a lot of mesothelioma sufferers and/or their families would have lost out if the insurers had won this argument. The insurers have lost.
The test case followed from the death of Charles O'Farrell. His family sued Excess Insurance, which covered his former employer, Humphreys & Glasgow. Other test cases, all heard together, were Fern v BAI; Bates v BAI; Fleming v Independent; Akzo Nobel & Amec Plc v Excess Ins. Co; and MMI v Zurich & Adur DC & ors.
Tel (0117) (international +44
117) 929 2662
Fax (0117) (international +44 117) 929 2722 |
|
 |
Relevant material
ASBESTOS COMPENSATION - NEW RULING - WHAT DOES IT MEAN?
Asbestos compensation court victory for victims
PLEURAL PLAQUES - LATEST NEWS
ASBESTOSIS & MESOTHELIOMA COMPENSATION: STEP BY STEP GUIDE What is asbestosis?
Asbestos claim viability
Mesothelioma
Asbestos dust risk to wives
Asbestos compensation
ASBESTOSIS: PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS: LIMITATION [TIME BAR] PERIODS
MESOTHELIOMA CLAIM : CASE STUDY
DEFENDANT EMPLOYER FOUND LIABLE AFTER 8 HOURS EXPOSURE TO ASBESTOS 38 YEARS AGO
Asbestos victims win right to damages
Asbestos
RSA and Lloyds face millions in asbestos payments
NEGLIGENCE - DAMAGES - PERSONAL INJURY
Law lords ruling leaves insurers facing huge claims over asbestos-related cancer
Engineering group sues Royal & Sun over asbestos
Malignant mesothelioma - interim payments - co-defendants - no need to establish liability of individual defendant
THORN -v- DATADEEP LIMITED
MESOTHELIOMA
£120,000 Penalty for Asbestosis Risk
Daughter continues asbestosis victim's fight
£200,000 FOR ENGINEER IN ASBESTOS TRAUMA
ASBESTOS RESPIRATORY DISEASES - FORESEEABILITY OF RISK OF HARM
Each year more than 4,500 people die from asbestos-related diseases
What is asbestos and where does it come from?
Asbestos toll has not hit its peak
Health and safety - negligence - personal
|
