Arbitration & mediation
Assets/shares buy/sell
Business start ups
Commercial & transactions
Commercial property
Company law & compliance
Competition law (UK & EU)
Confidentiality & privacy
Construction & building
Contracts drafting
Copyright (infringement & licensing)
Debt recovery & winding up
Designs (registration & infringement)
Directors' duties & liabilities
E-commerce contracts
Employment (contracts, regulations & claims)
Franchising
Insurance & reinsurance
Intellectual property
Joint ventures
Libel (defamation)
Licensing (premises)
Litigation (commercial)
Music & entertainment
Negligence (general)
Partnerships
Passing-off claims
Patents (infringement)
Planning representation
Professional (regulatory)
Professional negligence
Shareholders
Software (licensing)
Sports contracts
Trademark infringement
Trademark registration & brands
Approach to costs
Solicitors at Humphreys & Co. always aim to approach legal work in a financially-disciplined way. We offer competitive rates. Our charging approach is both transparent and geared to the options open to our clients. Our solicitors generally charge by reference to time spent but we can often agree fixed fees for specific work or in some cases risk-adjusted funding structures.

Send us a summary of your circumstances and objectives for a quick response.
Contracts: Commercial law: Media and entertainment: Electronic commerce
 
The applicant company (P) applied for summary judgment against a record label company (E) on its claim concerning the sale of tracks produced by a rock band.
 
An agreement had been executed in June 1999 between P and E, terminating all earlier agreements, in relation to the sale of music albums produced by the band.  A master licence agreement, which was incorporated into the June agreement, conferred a right on E to exploit certain albums.  The licence agreement included provisions relating to online distribution and defined ‘album’ and ‘record’.  An audit of a royalty statement carried out pursuant to the licence agreement indicated that a number of areas were undercounted to the value of £10m.  However, only some claims remained as others were settled.  The main disputes concerned online royalties and the sale of single tracks by E otherwise than in the original configuration of the albums without P’s consent.  P maintained that there was an unauthorised exploitation of single downloads, ringtones and streaming.  E submitted that many of the provisions of the licence agreement applied to physical products so that individual tracks could be sold in digital format.
 
Held: The purpose of the master licence agreement was to preserve the artistic integrity of the albums.  On a proper construction of that agreement, it extended to digital and like products.  It treated online distribution of musical tracks in the same way as the exploitation of physical products.  There was nothing in the definition of ‘album’ and ‘record’ to suggest that the agreement was confined to physical products.  Accordingly, the sale of albums in any configuration other than the original configuration was prohibited.  E had not demonstrated that there was a real prospect of resisting P’s claim.  Judgment in respect of other matters was given in private.
 
Application granted.
 
Robert Howe QC, Shaheed Fatima for the application; Elizabeth Jones QC for the respondent.
 
Pink Floyd Music Ltd & anr v EMI Records Ltd: Ch D (Sir Andrew Morritt (chancellor)): 11 March 2010
 
“Law Society’s Gazette”: 25.3.10
 
 





Humphreys & Co., solicitors Bristol

Accessibility
We take instructions from UK & international clients. Our independent lawyers are available by email, telephone & fax. With central Bristol offices we are just 90 minutes from London by road or rail and 15 minutes from Bristol International Airport. We can travel to meetings if required.

Independent approach
We are an independent professional law firm here, not a legal factory turning out mass-produced products. In our experience, determined case-handling is more likely to produce effective results.

Turnaround time
Solicitors at Humphreys & Co. look to input not only careful legal work and precision but also the determination to keep matters moving. They aim to work in clients' real interests with energy and pragmatism.

Communication skills
Solicitors at Humphreys & Co. always try to open up the legal process by giving advice and explaining options to clients in a concise and straightforward way, identifying clear courses of action whatever the technical or legal complexities of the subject.
Solicitors authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority of England & Wales under no.62944
Change to our Personal Legal Affairs section or go to our Home Page lawyers@humphreys.co.uk © copyright Humphreys & Co. Solicitors